Welcome

*****Skyote #88 gets Bronze Lindy for "Airventure-Oshkosh 2016 Plans Built Champion"******


October, 2007

Welcome to "Skyotelog", the build record of Skyote #88. I assume that you are familar with the Skyote biplane. If not, you should visit http://www.skyote.org/ for a complete introduction to this unique but elusive biplane.

The posts are presented in reverse chronological order (newest first). Or you can click on one of the "Labels" to see all of the posts concerning a specific topic. Click on any photo for a larger image.

All my building experience is limited to Van's RV's so I have no experience with building tube and fabric or "plans building". I have much to learn so take everything I write with a grain of salt and reasonable skepticisim.


I do not intend to follow a "traditional" path for the construction of #88. I intend to employ low level technology and $ to reduce the construction time and difficulty where possible and practical. By low level technology I am referring to CAD, laser, waterjet, CNC. For example:

  • I have purchased a complete wing spar kit from Jerry Kerr.
  • A rib kit from Mr. Bartoe.
  • Brunton Flying Wires and Drag wires from Harvey Swack.
  • CNC profiled tube kits for the fuselage, tail feathers and landing gear from VR3.

In addition I have converted all of the wing fittings, brackets, links, lugs etc. to CAD and had them cut by water jet. I have designed a laser cut wing spar drill template/jig which positions the five spar components so that all of the holes can be drilled in a complete spar as an assembly. I plan to continue converting as many parts as I can to CAD so that I can reduce the "hand-made" components to a minimum.

Note: As of June 2015 I have over 100 CAD files which provide 600+ water jet cut parts for the Skyote.


While it takes a little time, converting the design to CAD is a great way to truly understand the drawings. plus a huge amount of information has been extracted from the rather complex drawings. This can be a great help to others in understanding and interpreting the design.


The Skyote is uniquely suited for conversion to CAD in that a "computer" was used in it's original design. I have read that Mr. Bartoe used a HP calculator to "compute" the design and dimensions of the Skyote. The plans show all of the critical dimensions to three decimal places for X,Y and Z axes.


Amazingly, when I put the design into CAD the resulting 3D models agree with Mr. Bartoe's thee decimal place dimensions about 99.9% of the time. I have found one discrepancy but less than 0.030"!


If you want to build your Skyote as cheaply as possible, or if you enjoy handcrafting the same parts over and over again then my approach to building is not for you!


If you want to build your Skyote in the minimum possible time with highly accurate parts then this approach may be the answer. I personally get a lot of satisfaction out of organizing the project so that it can be produced accurately. Hopefully some of this work will prove useful to others in the future.


Comments are welcome. I will respond as time permits

To receive email notices of new posts just enter your email address in the block at the left. It will be confidential, only Google will know!

Wednesday, December 12, 2007

VR3 Final Report

I am happy to report that the final version of the VR3 Skyote fuselage tube kit has been assembled and checked. I received the replacement longeron and firewall tubes last week but just got around to assembling them yesterday. These tubes have a different arrangement for the joint between the longerons and the firewall tubes. The new joint arrangement provides the same type of interface with the landing gear and flying wire fittings as called for on the plans. The original joint design from VR3 was not wrong, just different.
The new joint design provides the same "perch" for the fittings, but eliminates the need for plugging the end of the longeron tube by mitering it to the vertical firewall tube. Since a picture is worth a thousand words, just take a look at the latest posting in the VR3 photo album. Others may take issue, but I am satisfied that the new joint is structurally equivalent to Pete's design while being easier and more accurate to build.
I am very happy with the VR3 kit. I have had a couple of experienced tube fuse builders look at it and they said that it would not be possible for them to duplicate the accuracy and fit quality using the traditional manual profiling methods.
The VR3 kit is about the same cost as Pete Bartoe's rib kit. In my opinion, the VR3 is at least, if not more of a time saver, than the rib kit. I think I could eventually hammer out the ribs if I had to. I'm not sure that I would ever get the fuse hand fitted to a point that would make me happy.
In my book, there are only two valid reasons not to go with the VR3 kit:
(1) You WANT to fit the tubes yourself.
(2) You can't justify the $$.
If you are not burdened by either of the above "problems" then VR3 is the way to go.
In conclusion, I have no connection with VR3, financial or otherwise.

No comments: